Need ideas about ntoskrnl
Peter Beutner
p.beutner at gmx.net
Wed Sep 7 00:03:41 CDT 2005
Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
> Peter Beutner <p.beutner at gmx.net> writes:
>
>
>>Any reasons given?
>
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
> wineserver.
>
Yupp most of the code maybe already in ntdll.
But imo it is quite as ugly, from a design point of view, to call ntdll
functions from inside the ntoskrnl.
It should be the other way around, shouldn't it?
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list