lostwages/wwn wn20051223_302.xml
WineHQ
wineowner at wine.codeweavers.com
Sat Dec 24 01:39:43 CST 2005
ChangeSet ID: 21961
CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit
Module name: lostwages
Changes by: wineowner at winehq.org 2005/12/24 01:39:43
Modified files:
wwn : wn20051223_302.xml
Log message:
fixups in WWN #302
Patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=21961
Old revision New revision Changes Path
1.1 1.2 +10 -8 lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml
Index: lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml
diff -u -p lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.1 lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.2
--- lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.1 24 Dec 2005 7:39:43 -0000
+++ lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml 24 Dec 2005 7:39:43 -0000
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ going to beta without any real attempt
freeze release cycle is not a good thing. At the very minimum I would
think that we should know when the releases are going to happen but we
do not even know that.
-<Rant>
+</Rant>
</p></quote>
<p>Alexandre replied:</p>
@@ -261,12 +261,12 @@ and <a href="http://bugs.winehq.org">Bug
and report problems.</p>
</section>
<section
- title=""
- subject=""
- archive="http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-October/.html"
- posts=""
+ title="OSDL Desktop Summit"
+ subject="[Desktop_architects] Portland, a w(h)iney comment"
+ archive="http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/desktop_architects/2005-December/000354.html"
+ posts="1"
>
-<topic></topic>
+<topic>Project Management</topic>
<p>We mentioned a few weeks ago (WWN
<a href="http://www.winehq.com/?issue=299#Desktop%20Summit">#299</a>) there
was a desktop summit being sponsored by OSDL. Well, Jeremy White and Dan
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ and PageMaker.
</p><p>
No one seems to care that Wine runs 3 of those 4.
</p><p>
-<Rodney Dangerfield> We get no respect! <Rodney Dangerfield>
+<Rodney Dangerfield> We get no respect! </Rodney Dangerfield>
</p><p>
<grin>
</p><p>
@@ -473,7 +473,9 @@ lines of code.</p></quote>
<p>Aric looked into it and noticed on SpecOps'
<a href="http://www.specopslabs.com/partners-stratigicpartners.htm"><i>Partners</i></a>
-page that IBM and TurboLinux were both listed.</p>
+page that IBM and TurboLinux were both listed. Given their long history with
+the community, presumably both of those companies would want to make sure the
+licensing was followed.</p>
<p>So, anyone out there have TurboLinux FUJI? Do you have the source
code changes to Wine?</p>
More information about the wine-cvs
mailing list